osrf-devel:benefits_of_opensrf_over_other_application_frameworks
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
osrf-devel:benefits_of_opensrf_over_other_application_frameworks [2008/08/27 20:55] – miker | osrf-devel:benefits_of_opensrf_over_other_application_frameworks [2022/02/10 13:34] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | [[user-comments: | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===== How OpenSRF Stacks Up ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | How does OpenSRF compare to other Application Frameworks on choice of development languages: | ||
+ | | ^ OpenSRF | ||
+ | ^ Native Perl Client | ||
+ | ^ Native C Client | ||
+ | ^ Native JavaScript Client | X | ||
+ | ^ Native Python Client | ||
+ | ^ Native Ruby Client | ||
+ | ^ Native Java Client | ||
+ | ^ Perl Server | ||
+ | ^ C Server | ||
+ | ^ Java Server | ||
+ | ^ Python Server | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | How does OpenSRF compare to other Application Frameworks on general features: | ||
+ | | ^ OpenSRF | ||
+ | ^ Built in load balancing | ||
+ | ^ Built in service failover | ||
+ | ^ Built in Object Persistance Model | X | ||
+ | ^ Centralized Application Configuration Management | X | ||
+ | ^ API Namespaces and API versioning | ||
+ | ^ Open inter-server messaging protocol | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | - [[Language Agnostic]] | ||