Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- evergreen-docs:dig_meeting_20111205-minutes [2011/12/06 11:32] – [Updates from Content Coordinators] tspindler
+++ evergreen-docs:dig_meeting_20111205-minutes [2011/12/06 11:37] – tspindler
@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 **Robert Soullier** -I have set up 2.1 DocBook Documentation processing -- HTML and PDF (see http://docs.evergreen-ils.org/2.1/html/). It is not linked from docs page yet. I had asked a few folks to review and provide feedback on the key chapters.  Installation instructions are taken from the REDME file packaged with Evergreen code. DocBook processing pulls from the 2.1 branch of the Documentation repository. It is pretty bare bones at this time with Release notes, installation instructions, and upgrade instructions as well as some of the appendices. If you have some documentation or know if some sources who can share please make a note on the 2.1 outline: http://open-ils.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=evergreen-docs_2.1:outline. If you have "raw" documentation (not in DocBook XML format) but have trouble converting, please share the  documentation with the DIG list so we can help convert and make a note on the outline.
-Ben Shum asked "At what point should some of us suggest specific wiki drafts to be converted into docbook for inclusion?"  No clear answer was provided.
+Ben Shum asked "At what point should some of us suggest specific wiki drafts to be converted into docbook for inclusion?"  No clear answer was provided.  Should we have a specific process?
+====== Old Business ======
+Tim Spindler asked "I had a question, does the documentation from 1.6 or 2.0 that is still valid get moved up to 2.1?"  Robert Soulliere indicated he was hoping folks could make notes on the outline indicating which docs can be moved "as is".  Kathly Lussier indicated that she was thinking when I put out my call for volunteers for OPAC/staff sections, I would ask for new documentation and a review of the old to see what could be moved up.