webteam:idea_percolator_options
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
webteam:idea_percolator_options [2011/11/10 13:10] – klussier | webteam:idea_percolator_options [2022/02/10 13:34] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
**a) IdeaTorrent (Amy/ | **a) IdeaTorrent (Amy/ | ||
- | User submits the idea, also using tag or category to identify cases where the user is willing to contribute funds, but is seeking co-sponsors or is planning to fund it, but is first seeking community feedback. | + | User submits the idea, also using tag or category to identify cases where the user is willing to contribute funds, but is seeking co-sponsors or is planning to fund it, |
+ | | ||
Once submitted, percolator analyzes keywords to determine if it may be a duplicate. Presents possible duplicates to users. | Once submitted, percolator analyzes keywords to determine if it may be a duplicate. Presents possible duplicates to users. | ||
Community maintainers and other interested individuals are alerted of the new submission. | Community maintainers and other interested individuals are alerted of the new submission. | ||
Line 10: | Line 11: | ||
Yes, adds an explanatory comment with a link to the ongoing project, possibly changing the status of the idea to cancelled. | Yes, adds an explanatory comment with a link to the ongoing project, possibly changing the status of the idea to cancelled. | ||
Others interested in the enhancement cast a vote for the idea and add comments/ | Others interested in the enhancement cast a vote for the idea and add comments/ | ||
- | Ideas with the most votes/ | + | |
+ | it gets moved into the ' | ||
+ | in 'use cases' | ||
+ | |||
+ | | ||
Idea moves forward (or not) in one of the following ways: | Idea moves forward (or not) in one of the following ways: | ||
- | | + | |
- | | + | |
- | Organization decides it is willing to contribute funds to the idea, but needs co-sponsors. Changes category or tag to “seeking co-sponsors.” | + | |
- | Idea gets no funding | + | |
+ | Organization with sufficient funding contracts with developer/ | ||
+ | Organization decides it is willing to contribute funds to the idea, but needs co-sponsors. Changes category or tag to “seeking co-sponsors.” | ||
+ | YES, This could be done with adding a tag | ||
+ | Idea gets no funding or development support. Sinks to the bottom of the percolator. | ||
+ | PROS: Designed for idea submissions along with other user comments, voting to determine idea popularity, some flexibility in adding tags/ | ||
+ | CONS: Less flexibility in design when compared to home-grown solution (ideas.galecia.com) | ||
**b) Standalone (or RSCEL-hosted) Drupal app (Jim/ | **b) Standalone (or RSCEL-hosted) Drupal app (Jim/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | http:// | ||
**c) Redmine/ | **c) Redmine/ | ||
Line 67: | Line 79: | ||
Step 4. Once submitted, percolator analyzes keywords to determine if it may be a duplicate. Presents possible duplicates to users. | Step 4. Once submitted, percolator analyzes keywords to determine if it may be a duplicate. Presents possible duplicates to users. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Step 5: Community maintainers are alerted of submission. - **I don't see any alert mechanism (e-mail or RSS) for new blueprint submissions.** | ||
Step 5. Adds an explanatory comment with a link to the ongoing project, possibly changing the status of the idea to cancelled. - **Click Superseded by and then link it to the duplicate project** | Step 5. Adds an explanatory comment with a link to the ongoing project, possibly changing the status of the idea to cancelled. - **Click Superseded by and then link it to the duplicate project** | ||
Line 74: | Line 88: | ||
Step 7. Ideas with most votes/ | Step 7. Ideas with most votes/ | ||
- | Step 8. Setting statuses - **There are various statuses: implementation status, definition status, and just plain status, that can indicate where the idea is in the development process. However, I don't see any flexibility for adding statuses or categorizations that indicate funding commitment. | + | Step 8. Setting statuses - **There are various statuses: implementation status, definition status, and just plain status, that can indicate where the idea is in the development process. However, I don't see any flexibility for adding statuses or categorizations that indicate funding commitment.** |
Pros of Launchpad Blueprints: | Pros of Launchpad Blueprints: | ||
Line 87: | Line 101: | ||
*For those who are not yet on Launchpad (the non-developer audience that would be posting ideas), a new account is required. | *For those who are not yet on Launchpad (the non-developer audience that would be posting ideas), a new account is required. | ||
+ | **f) Launchpad Bugs (Kathy)** | ||
+ | Step 2. User searches percolator - Yes, basic and advanced searching are available. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Step 3. User submits the idea, also using tag or category to identify cases where the user is willing to contribute funds, but is seeking co-sponsors or is planning to fund it, but is first seeking community feedback. - **Tags could be utilized to categorize ideas. A standard set of tags would need to be agreed upon by the community. Bugs that are really features requests are usually given an importance of " | ||
+ | |||
+ | Step 4. Once submitted, percolator analyzes keywords to determine if it may be a duplicate. Presents possible duplicates to users. - **Launchpad first requests a summary when submitting a bug. After entering the summary, it looks for potential duplicates before the user enters more detailed information.** | ||
+ | |||
+ | Step 5. Community maintainers are alerted of submission. - **Interested parties can subscribe to all bugs or can subscribe to bugs that use a certain tag.** | ||
+ | |||
+ | Step 5. Adds an explanatory comment with a link to the ongoing project, possibly changing the status of the idea to cancelled. - **Others can add comments. There is also a link to mark it as a duplicate. Enter the ID for the duplicate bug to create a link between the two.** | ||
+ | |||
+ | Step 6. Others interested in the enhancement cast a vote for the idea and add comments/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | Step 7. Ideas with most votes/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | Step 8. Setting statuses - **You can change the status to "in progress." | ||
+ | |||
+ | Pros of Launchpad Bugs: | ||
+ | | ||
+ | *For those already on Launchpad, no need to create a new account. | ||
+ | | ||
+ | |||
+ | Cons of Launchpad Bugs: | ||
+ | * Many developers will see these ideas as they are submitted. This may be too much noise. Further discussions with the developer community would be required. | ||
+ | * For those who are not yet on Launchpad (the non-developer audience that would be posting ideas), a new account is required. | ||
+ | * Some work would be required on the Evergreen wiki to link to canned bug searches to make it more accessible. |
webteam/idea_percolator_options.txt · Last modified: 2022/02/10 13:34 by 127.0.0.1