Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- advocacy:replies:2011-10-02-montoya [2011/10/03 10:42] – terlaga
+++ advocacy:replies:2011-10-02-montoya [2022/02/10 13:34] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
   - Can Evergreen offer multiple interfaces based on audience profiles to adjust the results and the interface. For example children, or persons with disabilities ?
     * Yes. The current catalogue interface, in use since Evergreen 1.6, has been tested with a screen reader, and offers the ability to be "skinned" to provide alternate interfaces such as a simplified children's catalogue. Evergreen 2.2 will also offer the [[dev:opac:template-toolkit:release_notes|"TPAC" catalogue interface]], which offers more semantically rich HTML and a user interface that will be visually appealing in modern browsers while able to be navigated in a text browser. The TPAC catalogue interface is also built to be easy to customize.
-    * The kids catalog for Evergreen is currently in development.  It will offer a search interface that can be limited to just juvenile materials based on copy location.
+    * The [[http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.education.libraries.open-ils.general/5100|kids catalog]] for Evergreen is currently in development.  It will offer a search interface that can be limited to just juvenile materials based on copy location.
   - Shall the ILS's interface be displayed on a mobile device according to ergonomics concerns ? Shall it be carried in a mobile version, and in iOS, Android and - maybe - Meego applications ?
     * The existing catalogue has been tested successfully with iOS and Android browsers; all functions can be carried out on these devices. The TPAC catalogue in 2.2 will offer an improved mobile experience as it uses much less bandwidth and makes fewer HTTP requests.