Special Developer Meeting: Future of the Staff Client
Held at
10:00:00 a.m. Wednesday, Feburary 6, 2013 in America/Los_Angeles
1:00:00 p.m. Wednesday, February 6, 2013 in Canada/Eastern
18:00:00 Wednesday, February 6, 2013 in UTC
Minutes
Minutes (text)
Raw meeting log
Agenda
Do we still need a staff client?
Go entirely web-based?
local sqlite db for client
scheduled uploads to main db at intervals
client-side data checking
no direct manipulation or update of data by staff-client user.
Have a minimal staff client for things like label printing?
Move as much as possible to chrome (client-side XUL)
perhaps even including fieldmapper metadata?
Pro: reduce latency and network traffic due to loading staff client UI elements
Pro: potentially simplify Apace caching configuration
Con: makes it more time-consuming to tweak and test staff UI changes, particularly if you're not running a Linux client
Removal of Dojo from staff client (proposal by Thomas Berezansky)
WebSockets (proposal by Bill Erickson)
Exploring WebSockets and Evergreen
Exploring WebSockets and Evergreen II: Long-lived Connections
Exploring WebSockets and Evergreen III: Proof of Concept
Objective third-party performance analysis to identify bottlenecks in the system. Future decisions on changes to staff client or other pieces of the Evergreen architecture could be based on evidence from this analysis. (proposal by Kathy Lussier)