How does OpenSRF compare to other Application Frameworks on choice of development languages:
| OpenSRF | J2EE | Catalyst | Maypole | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Native Perl Client | X | X | n/a | |
| Native C Client | X | |||
| Native JavaScript Client | X | |||
| Native Python Client | X | |||
| Native Ruby Client | (soon) | |||
| Native Java Client | X | X | ||
| Perl Server | X | X | X | |
| C Server | X | |||
| Java Server | (one day) | X | ||
| Python Server | X |
How does OpenSRF compare to other Application Frameworks on general features:
| OpenSRF | J2EE | Catalyst | Maypole | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Built in load balancing | X | X | ||
| Built in service failover | X | X | n/a | n/a |
| Built in Object Persistance Model | X | X | X | X |
| Centralized Application Configuration Management | X | n/a | n/a | |
| API Namespaces and API versioning | X | X | n/a | n/a |
| Open inter-server messaging protocol | X | X | n/a | n/a |