advocacy:replies:2011-10-02-montoya
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
advocacy:replies:2011-10-02-montoya [2011/10/03 09:53] – note visual appeal of tpac dbs | advocacy:replies:2011-10-02-montoya [2022/02/10 13:34] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
- Will it be possible to Evergreen to allow the user to access comments from other readers of other libraries or connected via a social network, during his navigation ? | - Will it be possible to Evergreen to allow the user to access comments from other readers of other libraries or connected via a social network, during his navigation ? | ||
- | | + | * Some exploratory work on enabling social features in Evergreen was [[http:// |
+ | * Evergreen supports the integration of the Chilifresh added content service out of the box, which offers an aggregated user-provided comment content to libraries that subscribe to the Chilifresh service. | ||
+ | | ||
+ | * Evergreen does not offer this feature today; there are no known plans to develop this feature. | ||
+ | - Will it incorporate FRBR to offer other multimedia editions of the work ? | ||
+ | * Evergreen has supported a FRBR-like search that offers results that include other editions & multimedia versions of a work since the 1.0 release in 2006. | ||
- Can Evergreen provide a single interface, fully integrated in the existing websites, providing search capabilities on the site of the institution and in the databases subscribed (federated search). | - Can Evergreen provide a single interface, fully integrated in the existing websites, providing search capabilities on the site of the institution and in the databases subscribed (federated search). | ||
+ | * Evergreen does not offer all of the features of a complete discovery layer; there are no known plans to develop this feature. Evergreen would prefer to continue to be easy to integrate into a dedicated discovery layer rather than attempting to become a discovery layer and diluting its focus. That said, Evergreen does offer integration with the SFX OpenURL resolver so that the electronic resources & coverage & embargo (if any) available for any ISBN or ISSN are displayed inline with Evergreen' | ||
- Can Evergreen offer multiple interfaces based on audience profiles to adjust the results and the interface. For example children, or persons with disabilities ? | - Can Evergreen offer multiple interfaces based on audience profiles to adjust the results and the interface. For example children, or persons with disabilities ? | ||
* Yes. The current catalogue interface, in use since Evergreen 1.6, has been tested with a screen reader, and offers the ability to be " | * Yes. The current catalogue interface, in use since Evergreen 1.6, has been tested with a screen reader, and offers the ability to be " | ||
+ | * The [[http:// | ||
- Shall the ILS's interface be displayed on a mobile device according to ergonomics concerns ? Shall it be carried in a mobile version, and in iOS, Android and - maybe - Meego applications ? | - Shall the ILS's interface be displayed on a mobile device according to ergonomics concerns ? Shall it be carried in a mobile version, and in iOS, Android and - maybe - Meego applications ? | ||
+ | * The existing catalogue has been tested successfully with iOS and Android browsers; all functions can be carried out on these devices. The TPAC catalogue in 2.2 will offer an improved mobile experience as it uses much less bandwidth and makes fewer HTTP requests. | ||
- Can Evergreen provide not only access to records of documents available in the libraries of the network, but also to digital documents in the library, scanned by it, or that it holds the rights via a subscription ? | - Can Evergreen provide not only access to records of documents available in the libraries of the network, but also to digital documents in the library, scanned by it, or that it holds the rights via a subscription ? | ||
+ | * Any resource accessible via an HTTP link can use Evergreen' | ||
- Is Evergreen able to index federate alternative sources of information ? I mean, the indexing of databases must be done ahead to provide a fast response time (I exclude OAI) | - Is Evergreen able to index federate alternative sources of information ? I mean, the indexing of databases must be done ahead to provide a fast response time (I exclude OAI) | ||
+ | * Evergreen does not seek to become a federated search engine; there are no known plans to develop this feature. | ||
- Can Evergreen ensure the supply of native metadata to search engines to allow a useful and effective referencing ? | - Can Evergreen ensure the supply of native metadata to search engines to allow a useful and effective referencing ? | ||
* Yes. Evergreen offers access to bibliographic records (with holdings) and authority records via SRU and Z39.50, as well as a number of APIs that support alternate formats. | * Yes. Evergreen offers access to bibliographic records (with holdings) and authority records via SRU and Z39.50, as well as a number of APIs that support alternate formats. | ||
advocacy/replies/2011-10-02-montoya.1317650023.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/02/10 13:33 (external edit)