Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- evergreen-docs:reorg_2014:agenda_2016-02-10 [2016/02/09 12:06] – [Ideas] fixing formatting sandbergja
+++ evergreen-docs:reorg_2014:agenda_2016-02-10 [2016/02/10 11:23] – [Requirements] rjs7
@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 ===== Develop consensus on project requirements =====
-[[http://wiki.evergreen-ils.org/doku.php?id=evergreen-docs:reorg_2014:requirements|Proposed project requirements]].
+The following agenda items are based on the [[http://wiki.evergreen-ils.org/doku.php?id=evergreen-docs:reorg_2014:requirements|Proposed project requirements document]].
 ==== Values check ====
+  * Do the [[http://wiki.evergreen-ils.org/doku.php?id=evergreen-docs:reorg_2014:requirements#ideas_expressed_about_this_project|values listed in the requirements document]] work for everybody?
 ==== Specific goals ====
+  * Any discussion points here?
 ==== Requirements ====
+  * Any discussion points here?
+  * Gather requirements from users (idea from remingtron)
+    * Let's consider getting feedback from documentation users to help guide our efforts. Maybe a broad survey to understand general needs, with questions like:
+    * How do you use Evergreen? (sys admin, staff client admin, circ superuser, circ normal user)
+    * How often while using Evergreen do you want help?
+    * Where is the first place you go for help? (supervisor, coworker, IRC, printed/handwritten notes, online documentation, youtube, my library's training documentation)
+    * Have you used the documentation available at docs.evergreen-ils.org?
+    * How useful has it been to you?
 ==== Ideas ====
@@ Line 16: / Line 26: @@
   * Platform (Asciidoc vs. flossmanuals vs. something else)?
   * If consensus on Asciidoc, how to create crosslinks?
-  * Which audiences should we target?
+  * Which audiences should we target?  For this discussion, we can use [[evergreen-docs:reorg_2014:audience_focused_layout|remingtron's draft as a starting place]]
-==== Identify compilers ====
+===== Identify compilers =====
 These people would be responsible for individual "books"
+===== Testing and assessment plan =====
+If we have time, it would be great to come up with a plan for testing these reorganized docs on end-users.  It would also be good to work towards a plan for assessing this work.
+===== Timeline =====
+If we have time, it would also be nice to start filling in the [[http://wiki.evergreen-ils.org/doku.php?id=evergreen-docs:reorg_2014:requirements#proposed_timeline|timeline on the requirements doc]].