dev:meetings:2011-03-01
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revision | ||
dev:meetings:2011-03-01 [2011/02/28 10:14] – created dbs | dev:meetings:2011-03-01 [2022/02/10 13:34] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | ====== Developer meeting: March 1, 2011 ====== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Held at | ||
+ | * 09:00:00 a.m. Tuesday March 1, 2011 in America/ | ||
+ | * 12:00:00 p.m. Tuesday March 1, 2011 in Canada/ | ||
+ | * 04:00:00 p.m. Tuesday March 1, 2011 in UTC | ||
+ | |||
+ | Last meeting: [[dev: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Agenda ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Meeting takes place on [[http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Logs and minutes ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [[http:// | ||
+ | * Minutes will be supplied in this document after the meeting finishes | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Prior to the meeting ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Please fill out [[community: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Agenda ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | - Determine the taker of minutes: Ben Shum | ||
+ | - Determine meeting leader: Dan Scott | ||
+ | |||
===== OpenSRF 2.0.0 ===== | ===== OpenSRF 2.0.0 ===== | ||
Problem was observed with entering / retrieving patron names containing Unicode in Evergreen 2.0 on OpenSRF 1.6. Dan found a fix for the problem in OpenSRF 2.0 but there' | Problem was observed with entering / retrieving patron names containing Unicode in Evergreen 2.0 on OpenSRF 1.6. Dan found a fix for the problem in OpenSRF 2.0 but there' | ||
Line 5: | Line 32: | ||
* Determine why Unicode patron name entry / retrieval worked with previous versions of OpenSRF but is broken in current version | * Determine why Unicode patron name entry / retrieval worked with previous versions of OpenSRF but is broken in current version | ||
* Test OpenSRF 2.0.0 for stability and potential adoption | * Test OpenSRF 2.0.0 for stability and potential adoption | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | **ACTION ITEM**: Test OpenSRF 2.0.0 with Evergreen 2.0.2 for stability and potential adoption: Ben Shum (tbd), Jason Etheridge (acq.open-ils.org), | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== PostgreSQL 9.0 support ===== | ||
+ | [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | Given that we largely didn't test or develop the Evergreen 2.0 upgrade script on PostgreSQL 9.0, are we supporting it for Evergreen 2.0? | ||
+ | |||
+ | If we do want to support PostgreSQL 9.0 for Evergreen 2.0, then does the path for support become running the 1.6-2.0.X script, where " | ||
+ | |||
+ | If we don't want to support PostgreSQL 9.0 for Evergreen 2.0, then does the migration path from 1.6 to 2.1 become: | ||
+ | * Upgrade database to 8.4 and upgrade EG 1.6 to 2.0 | ||
+ | * Upgrade database to 9.0 and upgrade EG 2.0 to 2.1 | ||
+ | |||
+ | This seems a bit headache-y. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Discussed by developers: | ||
+ | * Summary by Dan Scott: "If someone puts together a patch to update the upgrade script to support 9.0, as well as an accompanying 2.0.x-2.0.y patch, and it gets tested successfully, | ||
+ | * Mike Rylander requests community testing for binary upgrade from 8.4 to 9.0 (via pg_upgrade) | ||
===== Patch review queue ===== | ===== Patch review queue ===== | ||
- | We don't want to let submitted patches rot, here's a [[https:// | + | We don't want to let submitted patches rot, here's a [[https:// |
* [[https:// | * [[https:// | ||
* [[https:// | * [[https:// | ||
* [[https:// | * [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | Can we get committers to commit (hah) to reviewing and applying these patches (new features target 2.1 of course)? | ||
+ | |||
+ | * **ACTION ITEM**: Dan Scott to apply ' | ||
+ | * **ACTION ITEM**: Bill Erickson to review ' | ||
+ | * **ACTION ITEM**: Dan Scott to apply and test ' | ||
===== Google Summer of Code application ===== | ===== Google Summer of Code application ===== | ||
Line 16: | Line 69: | ||
* Need to put together a solid application, | * Need to put together a solid application, | ||
* Even if our application is turned down, it provides a good refresh of the long-in-the-tooth software bounties page and offers an entry point for other potential developers | * Even if our application is turned down, it provides a good refresh of the long-in-the-tooth software bounties page and offers an entry point for other potential developers | ||
- | * Deadline for applying: March 11, 2011; applications opened | + | * Deadline for applying: March 11, 2011; applications opened |
+ | |||
+ | * Dan Scott, Galen Charlton, and Jason Etheridge to meet and discuss potential projects list and application by next Tuesday, March 8. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Release statuses ===== | ||
+ | - Evergreen release status: | ||
+ | - 1.6.1.x (current release = 1.6.1.7) | ||
+ | - Bugs targeted to [[https:// | ||
+ | - 2.0.x (current release = 2.0.2) | ||
+ | - Bugs targeted to [[https:// | ||
+ | - 2.1 status | ||
+ | * Any target date yet? | ||
+ | - [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Next meeting ===== | ||
+ | * [[dev: |
dev/meetings/2011-03-01.1298906075.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/02/10 13:34 (external edit)