dev:meetings:2011-03-01
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
dev:meetings:2011-03-01 [2011/03/01 10:01] – Provide usual wrapper meeting stuff dbs | dev:meetings:2011-03-01 [2022/02/10 13:34] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
===== Agenda ===== | ===== Agenda ===== | ||
- | - Determine the taker of minutes: | + | - Determine the taker of minutes: |
- | - Determine meeting leader: | + | - Determine meeting leader: |
===== OpenSRF 2.0.0 ===== | ===== OpenSRF 2.0.0 ===== | ||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
* Determine why Unicode patron name entry / retrieval worked with previous versions of OpenSRF but is broken in current version | * Determine why Unicode patron name entry / retrieval worked with previous versions of OpenSRF but is broken in current version | ||
* Test OpenSRF 2.0.0 for stability and potential adoption | * Test OpenSRF 2.0.0 for stability and potential adoption | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | **ACTION ITEM**: Test OpenSRF 2.0.0 with Evergreen 2.0.2 for stability and potential adoption: Ben Shum (tbd), Jason Etheridge (acq.open-ils.org), | ||
===== PostgreSQL 9.0 support ===== | ===== PostgreSQL 9.0 support ===== | ||
Line 45: | Line 48: | ||
This seems a bit headache-y. | This seems a bit headache-y. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Discussed by developers: | ||
+ | * Summary by Dan Scott: "If someone puts together a patch to update the upgrade script to support 9.0, as well as an accompanying 2.0.x-2.0.y patch, and it gets tested successfully, | ||
+ | * Mike Rylander requests community testing for binary upgrade from 8.4 to 9.0 (via pg_upgrade) | ||
===== Patch review queue ===== | ===== Patch review queue ===== | ||
Line 53: | Line 60: | ||
Can we get committers to commit (hah) to reviewing and applying these patches (new features target 2.1 of course)? | Can we get committers to commit (hah) to reviewing and applying these patches (new features target 2.1 of course)? | ||
+ | |||
+ | * **ACTION ITEM**: Dan Scott to apply ' | ||
+ | * **ACTION ITEM**: Bill Erickson to review ' | ||
+ | * **ACTION ITEM**: Dan Scott to apply and test ' | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Google Summer of Code application ===== | ||
+ | * We have willing mentors (phasefx, gmcharlt, dbs) | ||
+ | * Need to put together a solid application, | ||
+ | * Even if our application is turned down, it provides a good refresh of the long-in-the-tooth software bounties page and offers an entry point for other potential developers | ||
+ | * Deadline for applying: March 11, 2011; applications opened Feb. 28th | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Dan Scott, Galen Charlton, and Jason Etheridge to meet and discuss potential projects list and application by next Tuesday, March 8. | ||
===== Release statuses ===== | ===== Release statuses ===== | ||
Line 58: | Line 77: | ||
- 1.6.1.x (current release = 1.6.1.7) | - 1.6.1.x (current release = 1.6.1.7) | ||
- Bugs targeted to [[https:// | - Bugs targeted to [[https:// | ||
- | - 2.0.x (current release = 2.0.1) | + | - 2.0.x (current release = 2.0.2) |
- | - Bugs targeted to [[https:// | + | - Bugs targeted to [[https:// |
- 2.1 status | - 2.1 status | ||
* Any target date yet? | * Any target date yet? | ||
Line 65: | Line 84: | ||
===== Next meeting ===== | ===== Next meeting ===== | ||
- | * [[dev: | + | * [[dev: |
dev/meetings/2011-03-01.1298991709.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/02/10 13:34 (external edit)