User Tools

Site Tools


dev:meetings:2011-03-01

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
dev:meetings:2011-03-01 [2011/03/01 10:02] – Update current release to 2.0.2 dbsdev:meetings:2011-03-01 [2022/02/10 13:34] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 23: Line 23:
 ===== Agenda ===== ===== Agenda =====
  
-  - Determine the taker of minutes: ? +  - Determine the taker of minutes: Ben Shum 
-  - Determine meeting leader: ?+  - Determine meeting leader: Dan Scott
  
 ===== OpenSRF 2.0.0 ===== ===== OpenSRF 2.0.0 =====
Line 32: Line 32:
   * Determine why Unicode patron name entry / retrieval worked with previous versions of OpenSRF but is broken in current version   * Determine why Unicode patron name entry / retrieval worked with previous versions of OpenSRF but is broken in current version
   * Test OpenSRF 2.0.0 for stability and potential adoption   * Test OpenSRF 2.0.0 for stability and potential adoption
 +
 +
 +**ACTION ITEM**: Test OpenSRF 2.0.0 with Evergreen 2.0.2 for stability and potential adoption: Ben Shum (tbd), Jason Etheridge (acq.open-ils.org), Bill Erickson (dev.gapines.org)
  
 ===== PostgreSQL 9.0 support ===== ===== PostgreSQL 9.0 support =====
Line 45: Line 48:
  
 This seems a bit headache-y. This seems a bit headache-y.
 +
 +Discussed by developers:
 +  * Summary by Dan Scott: "If someone puts together a patch to update the upgrade script to support 9.0, as well as an accompanying 2.0.x-2.0.y patch, and it gets tested successfully, we would accept it for 2.0.  A nice-to-have document would be a list of development targets and expected minimum prereqs (e.g. 2.1 - develop against postgresql 9.0 minimum)."
 +  * Mike Rylander requests community testing for binary upgrade from 8.4 to 9.0 (via pg_upgrade)
  
 ===== Patch review queue ===== ===== Patch review queue =====
Line 53: Line 60:
  
 Can we get committers to commit (hah) to reviewing and applying these patches (new features target 2.1 of course)? Can we get committers to commit (hah) to reviewing and applying these patches (new features target 2.1 of course)?
 +
 +  * **ACTION ITEM**: Dan Scott to apply 'Missing examples for "interval" settings' patch.
 +  * **ACTION ITEM**: Bill Erickson to review 'Patron Registration Customization Overhaul' and send thoughts to dev-list by Thursday March 3.
 +  * **ACTION ITEM**: Dan Scott to apply and test 'Permission Profile Filtering in Patron Search Interface'
 +
 +===== Google Summer of Code application =====
 +  * We have willing mentors (phasefx, gmcharlt, dbs)
 +  * Need to put together a solid application, with a list of potential ideas for student projects that would be helpful to Evergreen, ideally with a list of prerequisite knowledge and easy/medium/difficult ratings
 +    * Even if our application is turned down, it provides a good refresh of the long-in-the-tooth software bounties page and offers an entry point for other potential developers
 +  * Deadline for applying: March 11, 2011; applications opened Feb. 28th
 +
 +  * Dan Scott, Galen Charlton, and Jason Etheridge to meet and discuss potential projects list and application by next Tuesday, March 8.
  
 ===== Release statuses ===== ===== Release statuses =====
Line 65: Line 84:
  
 ===== Next meeting ===== ===== Next meeting =====
-  * [[dev:meetings:2011-03-01|Tuesday, March 15th]] at 12:00 EST, 9:00 PST+  * [[dev:meetings:2011-03-15|Tuesday, March 15th]] at 12:00 EST, 9:00 PST
dev/meetings/2011-03-01.1298991769.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/02/10 13:34 (external edit)

Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International
CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki

© 2008-2022 GPLS and others. Evergreen is open source software, freely licensed under GNU GPLv2 or later.
The Evergreen Project is a U.S. 501(c)3 non-profit organization.