dev:meetings:2011-03-01
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
dev:meetings:2011-03-01 [2011/03/01 12:42] – bshum | dev:meetings:2011-03-01 [2022/02/10 13:34] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
* Determine why Unicode patron name entry / retrieval worked with previous versions of OpenSRF but is broken in current version | * Determine why Unicode patron name entry / retrieval worked with previous versions of OpenSRF but is broken in current version | ||
* Test OpenSRF 2.0.0 for stability and potential adoption | * Test OpenSRF 2.0.0 for stability and potential adoption | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | **ACTION ITEM**: Test OpenSRF 2.0.0 with Evergreen 2.0.2 for stability and potential adoption: Ben Shum (tbd), Jason Etheridge (acq.open-ils.org), | ||
===== PostgreSQL 9.0 support ===== | ===== PostgreSQL 9.0 support ===== | ||
Line 45: | Line 48: | ||
This seems a bit headache-y. | This seems a bit headache-y. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Discussed by developers: | ||
+ | * Summary by Dan Scott: "If someone puts together a patch to update the upgrade script to support 9.0, as well as an accompanying 2.0.x-2.0.y patch, and it gets tested successfully, | ||
+ | * Mike Rylander requests community testing for binary upgrade from 8.4 to 9.0 (via pg_upgrade) | ||
===== Patch review queue ===== | ===== Patch review queue ===== | ||
Line 53: | Line 60: | ||
Can we get committers to commit (hah) to reviewing and applying these patches (new features target 2.1 of course)? | Can we get committers to commit (hah) to reviewing and applying these patches (new features target 2.1 of course)? | ||
+ | |||
+ | * **ACTION ITEM**: Dan Scott to apply ' | ||
+ | * **ACTION ITEM**: Bill Erickson to review ' | ||
+ | * **ACTION ITEM**: Dan Scott to apply and test ' | ||
===== Google Summer of Code application ===== | ===== Google Summer of Code application ===== | ||
Line 59: | Line 70: | ||
* Even if our application is turned down, it provides a good refresh of the long-in-the-tooth software bounties page and offers an entry point for other potential developers | * Even if our application is turned down, it provides a good refresh of the long-in-the-tooth software bounties page and offers an entry point for other potential developers | ||
* Deadline for applying: March 11, 2011; applications opened Feb. 28th | * Deadline for applying: March 11, 2011; applications opened Feb. 28th | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Dan Scott, Galen Charlton, and Jason Etheridge to meet and discuss potential projects list and application by next Tuesday, March 8. | ||
===== Release statuses ===== | ===== Release statuses ===== | ||
Line 71: | Line 84: | ||
===== Next meeting ===== | ===== Next meeting ===== | ||
- | * [[dev: | + | * [[dev: |
dev/meetings/2011-03-01.1299001374.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/02/10 13:34 (external edit)