community:meetings:2010-12
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
community:meetings:2010-12 [2010/12/22 10:59] – dbs | community:meetings:2010-12 [2022/02/10 13:34] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
* Last meeting' | * Last meeting' | ||
* Raw IRC logs [[http:// | * Raw IRC logs [[http:// | ||
- | * Next meeting: [[community: | + | * Next meeting: [[community: |
===== Agenda and minutes ===== | ===== Agenda and minutes ===== | ||
- (5 minutes) Introductions / roll call; paste "/me is < | - (5 minutes) Introductions / roll call; paste "/me is < | ||
- | - (2 min) Find a volunteer | + | - (2 min) Find volunteers |
+ | * Run the meeting: **Ben Shum** | ||
+ | * Take minutes: **Dan Scott** | ||
- (10 min) Review action items from [[community: | - (10 min) Review action items from [[community: | ||
- Create a list of specific areas where the DIG needs help in fleshing out information. [ Karen Collier ] | - Create a list of specific areas where the DIG needs help in fleshing out information. [ Karen Collier ] | ||
Line 44: | Line 46: | ||
* There will be at least one proposed session on reports for the 2011 Conference. | * There will be at least one proposed session on reports for the 2011 Conference. | ||
- (5 min) Developer report | - (5 min) Developer report | ||
- | - We have started to develop a release checklist (from the [[: | + | - We have started to develop a [[dev: |
- // | - // | ||
- // | - // | ||
Line 69: | Line 71: | ||
- (5 min) Governance Committee report [Dan Scott] | - (5 min) Governance Committee report [Dan Scott] | ||
* The Governance Committee has been in contact with the Software Freedom Conservancy about the proposed membership agreement, and Bradley Kuhn of the Conservancy has been engaged in discussions on the Evergreen | * The Governance Committee has been in contact with the Software Freedom Conservancy about the proposed membership agreement, and Bradley Kuhn of the Conservancy has been engaged in discussions on the Evergreen | ||
- | * Rather than three representatives between the Evergreen project and the Conservancy, | + | * Rather than three representatives between the Evergreen project and the Conservancy, |
* Now that we understand how the Conservancy draws its percentage of donations, and there is the likelihood that conference funds and pooled development funds will flow through the Conservancy account, we're leaning towards offering 5% of project funds rather than 10%. The Conference Planning Committee will budget accordingly. | * Now that we understand how the Conservancy draws its percentage of donations, and there is the likelihood that conference funds and pooled development funds will flow through the Conservancy account, we're leaning towards offering 5% of project funds rather than 10%. The Conference Planning Committee will budget accordingly. | ||
* The wording of the agreement seems close to completion; Bradley Kuhn from the Conservancy will attend the next governance meeting (in January) to discuss any remaining concerns and hopefully come to an agreement. One of the last concerns is describing how the Evergreen Governance Committee (in the agreement referred to as the Evergreen Oversight Board) is replaced/ | * The wording of the agreement seems close to completion; Bradley Kuhn from the Conservancy will attend the next governance meeting (in January) to discuss any remaining concerns and hopefully come to an agreement. One of the last concerns is describing how the Evergreen Governance Committee (in the agreement referred to as the Evergreen Oversight Board) is replaced/ |
community/meetings/2010-12.1293033558.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/02/10 13:34 (external edit)