User Tools

Site Tools


governance:minutes:2016-5-19

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
governance:minutes:2016-5-19 [2016/05/18 14:59] gdunbargovernance:minutes:2016-5-19 [2022/02/10 13:34] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 6: Line 6:
   * Discussion regarding clarification to the minutes.   * Discussion regarding clarification to the minutes.
  
-3. Conference Committee  +3. Financial Update (Galen) 
-  *EOB volunteers for the standing conference committee?+  *[[http://wiki.evergreen-ils.org/doku.php?id=governance:financials:update_2016_05_19]] 
 +  *The Project is $29,114.80 in the black. 
 +  *The 2016 [Conference] is currently $509.86 in the red.   
 +    *Note that there may be some pending payments that have not hit the ledger yet.   
 + 
 +4. Conference Committee  
 +  *EOB volunteers to expand the standing conference committee?
   *Issues or objections to the idea of the mailing lists as detailed here:  [[http://list.evergreen-ils.org/pipermail/eg-oversight-board/2016-May/001441.html]]   *Issues or objections to the idea of the mailing lists as detailed here:  [[http://list.evergreen-ils.org/pipermail/eg-oversight-board/2016-May/001441.html]]
   *Update on the 2017 process. (Grace)   *Update on the 2017 process. (Grace)
  
-4. Review and revision of the Rules of Governance +5. Review and revision of the Rules of Governance 
   * Community member Elizabeth McKinney stated, "I would like to formally request that the Evergreen Oversight Board undertake a review of the Evergreen Rules of Governance, section 2.8. Conflicts of Interest."   * Community member Elizabeth McKinney stated, "I would like to formally request that the Evergreen Oversight Board undertake a review of the Evergreen Rules of Governance, section 2.8. Conflicts of Interest."
   * Should this review be expanded to include a review of the whole of the Rules of Governance?     * Should this review be expanded to include a review of the whole of the Rules of Governance?  
   * Would it be beneficial to have this review be in person potentially with an impartial moderator?   * Would it be beneficial to have this review be in person potentially with an impartial moderator?
   * If the review should be in person, would it be appropriate/possible to use Evergreen funds to subsidize travel/lodging for EOB members to attend?   * If the review should be in person, would it be appropriate/possible to use Evergreen funds to subsidize travel/lodging for EOB members to attend?
 +  * Shall we create a committee to review the Rules of Governance?
  
  
Line 22: Line 29:
   *Outreach Committee Business (Kathy)   *Outreach Committee Business (Kathy)
   *Release Manager's Report   (Mike)   *Release Manager's Report   (Mike)
-  *Policies and Procedures for Executive Sessions +
-  *Review of process for Board Elections and Officer Elections+
governance/minutes/2016-5-19.1463597941.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/02/10 13:34 (external edit)

Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International
CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki

© 2008-2022 GPLS and others. Evergreen is open source software, freely licensed under GNU GPLv2 or later.
The Evergreen Project is a U.S. 501(c)3 non-profit organization.